| 4,527 | 70 | 142 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
通过多案例研究方式，主要从环保费改税后企业税负变化、研发投入、创新成果和专利情况以及污染处理技术四个方面，分析了环保费改税对于重污染企业绿色技术创新的影响，证实了环保费改税对企业开展绿色创新活动有着正向激励和反向倒逼的作用，提升了企业的绿色技术创新能力。进而提出如下政策建议：应完善相关政策支持体系，进一步加强对企业绿色技术创新的补贴支持；不断扩大污染物征税范围，推动“双碳”目标实现；企业应加大研发投入，实施绿色技术创新战略；更新升级生产设备，提高污染处理技术。
Abstract：This paper analyzes the relationship between the change of environmental protection fee into tax and the green technological innovation of heavily polluting enterprises through multiple case studies, mainly from the following four aspects: the change of enterprise tax burden after the change of environmental protection fee into tax, R&D investment, innovation achievements and patents, and pollution treatment technology. It confirms that the change of environmental protection fee into tax has a positive incentive and reverse force on enterprises to carry out green technological innovation activities, and improves the green technological innovation ability of enterprises. Then, the following policy recommendations are put forward: Relevant policy support systems should be improved to further strengthen the subsidy support for green technological innovation of enterprises; It should continuously expand the scope of pollutant tax and promote the realization of the dual-carbon goal; Enterprises should increase R&D investment and implement green technological innovation strategy; It should update and upgrade production equipment and improve pollution treatment technology.
[1] BONNET C, BOUAMRA-MECHEMACHE Z, CORRE T. An environmental tax towards more sustainable food:Empirical evidence of the consumption of animal products in France[J].Ecological Economics, 2018, 147:48-61.
[2] EKINS P. European environmental taxes and charges:Recent experience, issues and trends[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999,31(1):39-62.
[3] ALEXEEV A, GOOD D H, KRUTILLA K. Environmental taxation and the double dividend in decentralized jurisdictions[J]. Ecological Economics, 2016, 122:90-100.
[4] FELDER S, SCHLEINIGER R. Environmental tax reform:Efficiency and political feasibility[J]. Ecological Economics,2002, 42(1-2):107-116.
[5] FREIRE-GONZáLEZ J. Environmental taxation and the double dividend hypothesis in CGE modelling literature:A critical review[J]. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2018, 40:194-223.
[6] BOVENBERG A L, DE MOOIJ R A. Environmental tax reform and endogenous growth[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 1997,63(2):207-237.
[7] CARRARO C, GALEOTTI M, GALLO M. Environmental taxation and unemployment:Some evidence on the ‘double dividend hypothesis’ in Europe[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 1996, 62:141-181.
[8] STERNER T. Environmental tax reform:the Swedish experience[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,1994, 4(6):20-25.
[9]杨志勇，何代欣.公共政策视角下的环境税[J].税务研究，2011(7):29-32.
[10]段志国，王陆潇.环保税与排污权交易的比较研究[J].中国战略新兴产业，2017(40):11.
[11]童锦治，温馨，邱荣富.环境保护税的开征能有效治理空气污染吗？[J].税务研究，2022(8):94-100.
[12]周波，杨李路，李冀宁.我国环境保护税开征显著改善环境质量了吗：基于地市级城市环境指标的实证分析[J].税务研究，2022(11):59-65.
[13]余东华，胡亚男.环境规制趋紧阻碍中国制造业创新能力提升吗?：基于“波特假说”的再检验[J].产业经济研究，2016(2):11-20.
[14]杨飞.环境税、环境补贴与清洁技术创新：理论与经验[J].财经论丛，2017(8):19-27.
[15]赵爱武，杜建国，关洪军.环境税情景下企业环境技术创新模拟[J].管理科学，2016,29(1):40-52.
[16]刘金科，肖翊阳.中国环境保护税与绿色创新：杠杆效应还是挤出效应?[J].经济研究，2022,57(1):72-88.
[17]黄纪强，祁毓.环境税能否倒逼产业结构优化与升级?：基于环境“费改税”的准自然实验[J].产业经济研究，2022(2):1-13.
[18]于连超，孙帆，毕茜，等.环境保护费改税有助于提升企业产能利用率吗？：来自《环境保护税法》实施的准自然实验证据[J].上海财经大学学报，2021,23(4):32-47.
[19]于连超，张卫国，毕茜.环境保护费改税促进了重污染企业绿色转型吗?：来自《环境保护税法》实施的准自然实验证据[J].中国人口·资源与环境，2021,31(5):109-118.
[20]贺娜，李香菊.企业异质性、环保税与技术创新：基于税制绿化视角的研究[J].税务研究，2018(3):74-80.
[21]薛钢，明海蓉，蔡颜西.双重红利目标下我国环境保护税制度优化路径研究[J].国际税收，2021(12):29-38.
[22]牛欢，严成樑.环境税率、双重红利与经济增长[J].金融研究，2021(7):40-57.
基本信息:
中图分类号:X322;F812.42;F275;F273.1
引用信息:
[1]冯鸿雁,赵芳嵘,胡海川,等.环保费改税对重污染企业绿色技术创新的影响研究——基于《中华人民共和国环境保护税法》实施的多案例分析[J].生态经济,2024,40(01):151-159.
基金信息:
河北省社会科学基金重点项目“环境税费改革对企业行为决策和绩效的影响及政策优化”（HB20YJ001）
2024-01-04
2024-01-04