| 210 | 0 | 183 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
在“双碳”目标引领下,协同推进降碳、减污、扩绿、增长发展是破解生态环境与经济发展矛盾的必然选择。论文将新能源示范城市试点政策视为一项准自然实验,基于2006—2023年我国279个地级及以上城市的面板数据,借助双重差分模型探析新能源示范城市试点政策对城市的降碳-减污-扩绿-增长协同效应及作用机制。研究显示,新能源示范城市试点政策显著促进城市的降碳-减污-扩绿-增长协同效应并在一系列稳健性检验后该结论仍成立。政策实施效果在东部地区、非资源型城市及环境规制强的城市更显著。进一步研究发现,新能源示范城市试点政策可通过推动绿色技术创新赋能城市降碳-减污-扩绿-增长协同效应。同时,产业结构高度化在新能源示范城市试点政策促进城市降碳-减污-扩绿-增长协同效应中具有正向调节作用,而财政压力呈现负向调节效应。扩展性分析表明,新能源示范城市试点政策对城市降碳-减污-扩绿-增长协同效应具有显著的正向空间溢出特征。建议持续推广新能源示范城市试点政策,合理扩大覆盖范围,因地制宜施策,精准推动城市降碳-减污-扩绿-增长协同发展。
Abstract:Under the guidance of the dual carbon goals, promoting the coordinated development of carbon reduction, pollution reduction, green expansion, and economic growth is an inevitable choice to resolve the contradiction between ecological environment and economic development. This paper regards the pilot policy of new energy demonstration cities as a quasi-natural experiment, and based on the panel data of 279 prefecture-level and above cities in China from 2006 to 2023, uses the difference-in-differences model to explore the coordinated effect of the pilot policy of new energy demonstration cities on carbon reduction, pollution reduction, green expansion, and economic growth, as well as its mechanism. The research shows that the pilot policy of new energy demonstration cities significantly promotes the coordinated effect of carbon reduction-pollution reduction-green expansion-economic growth of cities, and this conclusion remains valid after a series of robustness tests. The policy implementation effect is more significant in the eastern region, non-resource-based cities, and cities with strong environmental regulations. Further research finds that the pilot policy of new energy demonstration cities can promote the coordinated effect of carbon reduction-pollution reduction-green expansion-economic growth of cities by promoting green technological innovation. At the same time, the industrial structure upgrading has a positive moderating effect on the coordinated effect of carbon reduction-pollution reduction-green expansion-economic growth promoted by the pilot policy of new energy demonstration cities, while fiscal pressure has a negative moderating effect. The extended analysis shows that the pilot policy of new energy demonstration cities has a significant positive spatial spillover effect on the coordinated effect of carbon reduction-pollution reduction-green expansion-economic growth of cities. It is suggested to continuously promote the pilot policy of new energy demonstration cities, reasonably expand the coverage, implement policies based on local conditions, and precisely promote the coordinated development of carbon reduction-pollution reduction-green expansion-economic growth of cities.
[1]袁晓玲,郗继宏,钟楚潮,等. 中国城市“减污降碳”协同驱动因素及实现路径研究[J]. 管理学刊,2023,36(4):26-46.
[2]岳立,黄晨曦,朱玖,等. 中国区域减污降碳经济增长潜力与倾向度分析[J]. 经济地理,2025,45(6):47-58.
[3]胡剑波,张宽元,韩君. 我国省域降碳减污绩效测度、时空分异与收敛性研究[J]. 统计研究,2025,42(2):99-110.
[4]李俊明,魏雯琪,张鹏,等. 中国市域数字经济发展对减污降碳协同的促进效应及其空间分异[J]. 经济地理,2023,43(12):169-180.
[5]邢会,霍晓谦. 中国县域减污降碳协同增效的时空演变及影响因素[J]. 中国环境科学,2025,45(3):1657-1673.
[6]吴戈,张月池,苗壮. 我国工业减污降碳的绿色偏向技术进步:要素贡献、偏向识别与影响因素[J]. 统计研究,2024,41(5):3-14.
[7]Yan X, Tong D, Zheng Y, et al. Cost-effectiveness uncertainty may bias the decision of coal power transitions in China [J]. Nature Communications, 2024, 15(1): 2272.
[8]Zeng Q, He L. Study on the synergistic effect of air pollution prevention and carbon emission reduction in the context of “dual carbon”: Evidence from China’s transport sector [J]. Energy Policy, 2023, 173: 113370.
[9]汪振双,王宇飞,汪涛,等. 建筑业降碳-减污-扩绿-增长协同效应空间关联网络特征及驱动机制[J]. 中国环境科学,2025,45(7):4064-4079.
[10]闫坤,唐丹彤,甘天琦. 中国农业减污降碳协同效应的量化评估与动态演化:基于边际减排成本的分析[J]. 中国农村经济,2024(9):22-41.
[11]何启志,郭梦娟. 中国省域减污降碳协同效应分析及驱动因素[J]. 环境科学,2026,47(7):4544-4557.
[12]黄晓慧,杨飞. 化肥农药零增长行动的农业减污降碳协同效应及脱钩效应分析[J]. 生态经济,2024,40(2):117-123.
[13]Yu C, Zhang Y, Di D Y, et al. Digital transformation and synergistic reduction in pollution and carbon emissions: An analysis from a dynamic capability perspective [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2025(261): 119683.
[14]姜浩,邓峰. 新能源示范城市建设的减污降碳协同治理效应研究[J]. 软科学,2025,39(7):60-69.
[15]Zhao N, Jin M, Qiu Z, et al. How public environmental appeals affect the collaborative governance in pollution and carbon reduction: Evidence from spatial effects across Chinese cities [J]. Environmental Research, 2024, 256: 119249.
[16]陶长琪,谢涛,徐晔. 绿色技术创新与减污降碳协同增效:基于联合减排与环境改善的视角[J]. 统计研究,2025,42(4):31-47.
[17]罗良文,雷朱家华. 中国碳市场政策的减污降碳协同效应[J]. 资源科学,2024,46(1):53-68.
[18]张雪纯,曹霞,宋林壕. 碳排放交易制度的减污降碳效应研究:基于合成控制法的实证分析[J]. 自然资源学报,2024,39(3):712-730.
[19]李强,温家俊. 低碳城市试点促进了减污降碳协同增效吗?[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2025,46(3):40-50.
[20]崔连标,王佳雪. 国家级城市群政策对中国减污降碳的影响研究[J]. 当代财经,2025(8):3-16.
[21]王珮,崔铭芯,宋欣畅,等. 环境保护税的减污降碳协同治理效应研究[J]. 税务研究,2025(9):45-54.
[22]王芝炜,孙慧,张贤峰,等. 用能权交易制度能否实现减污降碳的双重环境福利?[J]. 产业经济研究,2023(4):15-26.
[23]张洪昌,王越,王伟梅,等. 国家大数据综合试验区设立是否促进减污降碳协同增效?:基于双重机器学习的因果推断[J]. 中国环境管理,2025,17(5):144-154.
[24]范玉莹,陈东景,郑浩天. 新能源示范城市建设对工业企业绿色转型的影响及机制[J]. 资源科学,2024,46(9):1685-1698.
[25]程洪飞,李豫新,曹梦渊. 降碳与增长何以兼得?:基于新能源示范城市政策的经验研究[J]. 财经研究,2024,50(7):126-140.
[26]周安华,王赛鸽. 中国新能源示范城市政策对新能源企业绿色创新的影响及其作用机制[J]. 资源科学,2023,45(12):2463-2479.
[27]Liu X, Wang C, Wu H, et al. The impact of the new energy demonstration city construction on energy consumption intensity: Exploring the sustainable potential of China’s firms [J]. Energy, 2023, 283: 128716.
[28]Zhou A, Wang S, Chen B. Impact of new energy demonstration city policy on energy efficiency: Evidence from China [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 422: 138560.
[29]林育妙,程秋旺,许安心. 新能源示范城市建设的碳减排效应研究[J]. 调研世界,2024,(1):26-36.
[30]程洪飞,李豫新. 能源转型与减污降碳协同治理:基于新能源示范城市政策的准自然实验[J]. 华东经济管理,2025,39(12):108-118.
[31]李潇翔,卢锐. 绿色转型赋能新质生产力发展的动力机制与实践路径[J]. 现代经济探讨,2025(4):92-99.
[32]陈力朋,刘金婷,刘华. 财政科技投入力度与企业创新产出:作用机制与异质性[J]. 西部论坛,2023,33(6):64-80.
[33]苏涛永,王柯,孟丽. 产学研协同对绿色技术创新的影响:专业相关度、行业联盟和政府参与的调节效应[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2025,46(6):46-62.
[34]靳玮,潘冬阳,王子昊,等. 绿色产业和绿色金融政策组合推动经济低碳转型机制研究[J/OL]. 系统工程理论与实践,2025:1-29. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2267.N.20251023.1332.002.
[35]李敏,崔晓阳,庞贵芳,等. 长江经济带生态环境与经济高质量发展耦合协调及交互影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2025,34(7):1399-1412.
[36]李豫新,程洪飞,倪超军. 能源转型政策与城市绿色创新活力:基于新能源示范城市政策的准自然实验[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2023,33(1):137-149.
[37]张海峰,王丽,刘春雪. 省以下财政压力与环境污染的“虹吸效应”:区域一体化均衡治理视角[J]. 经济评论,2025(1):152-164.
[38]宋马林,陶伟良,王建林. 节能减排财政政策综合示范城市建设促进能源与产业双重结构转型吗?[J]. 自然资源学报,2025,40(7):1773-1794.
[39]江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济,2022(5):100-120.
[40]Li Y, Hao S Z, Liu Y, et al. Research on the spatial correlation network and its driving factors for synergistic development of pollution reduction, carbon reduction, greening, and growth in China’s tourism industry [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2025, 377: 124579.
[41]Sun F, Guo J, Huang X, et al. Spatio-temporal characteristics and coupling coordination relationship between industrial green water efficiency and science and technology innovation: A case study in China [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2024, 159: 111651.
[42]陈毅辉,李敏杰. 我国农业降碳-减污-扩绿-增长协同发展空间关联网络的结构特征及驱动因素[J]. 环境科学,2025:1-20. https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202505038.
[43]谢地,王灵祎. 能源转型政策与城市绿色全要素生产率提升:基于新能源示范城市试点政策的准自然实验[J]. 工业技术经济,2025,44(8):107-117.
[44]刘洋,李敬,雷俐. 数字金融发展推动中国城市产业结构升级了吗?:来自地级及以上城市的经验证据[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版),2022,48(6):123-136.
[45]王兰,徐盈之. 跨界流域生态补偿政策能够协同推进降碳减污扩绿增长吗:来自中国263个地级市的经验证据[J]. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2025,25(6):90-106.
[46]程博,蔡云霏. 经济责任审计、代理成本与国有企业现金持有[J]. 上海财经大学学报,2024,26(5):107-121.
[47]姜浩,邓峰. 新能源汽车试点政策能否助力城市减污降碳协同增效?[J]. 经济经纬,2025,42(6):89-102.
基于数据的可得性,本文剔除了海东市、吐鲁番市、哈密市、克拉玛依市、三沙市、儋州市、毕节市、铜仁市、拉萨市、日喀则市、昌都市、林芝市、山南市、那曲市、嘉峪关市、金昌市、固原市、中卫市共18个城市。
处理组在政策原始名单中剔除了以区为单位设立的示范城市、县级层面的城市及产业园区。
基本信息:
中图分类号:F426.2;X321
引用信息:
[1]贯君,唐晓婷,马珝淇.能源转型政策能否促进城市降碳-减污-扩绿-增长的协同效应?[J].生态经济().
基金信息:
黑龙江省哲学社会科学研究规划项目“城市群减污降碳协同增效的远程耦合机制及优化路径”(25JYC018); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“城市群减污降碳协同增效的远程耦合机制及优化路径”(2572026DZ10)
2026-08-11
2026-08-11
2026-08-11