| 788 | 1 | 171 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
改善流域环境，增进民生福祉，提高人民生活品质是流域生态补偿的根本目的。论文基于2005—2021年皖浙两省27个地级市数据，采用双重差分法实证分析新安江流域生态补偿对区域共同富裕的影响。研究发现：(1)新安江流域生态补偿政策能够显著提升上游和下游地区的共同富裕水平；(2)生态补偿政策通过发挥结构效应、就业效应和生态福利效应提高区域共同富裕水平；(3)相较于上游，生态补偿对下游地区富裕水平的促进效果更为明显。生态补偿能够显著提升上游地区的共享水平，但未能提升下游地区共享水平。最后，从优化流域生态补偿机制、推动生态补偿与就业减贫有机结合、促进生态价值转化等方面提出政策建议。
Abstract：Improving the environment of the river basin,improving people’s livelihood and well-being,and improving the quality of people’s life are the fundamental purposes of ecological compensation in the river basin.Based on the data of 27 prefecture-level cities in Anhui and Zhejiang provinces from 2005 to 2021,this paper empirically analyzes the impact of ecological compensation on regional common prosperity in the Xin’an River Basin by using the difference-in-difference method.The results show that:(1) The ecological compensation policy in the Xin’an River Basin can significantly improve the level of common prosperity in the upstream and downstream areas.(2) The results of mechanism analysis show that the ecological compensation policy improves the level of regional common prosperity by giving full play to the structural effect,employment effect and ecological welfare effect.(3) Further research finds that compared with the upstream,the effect of ecological compensation on the affluence level of the downstream area is more obvious.Ecological compensation can improve the sharing level of upstream areas,but the policy effect on the sharing level of downstream areas is not significant.The study puts forward policy suggestions such as optimizing the basin ecological compensation mechanism,promoting the organic combination of ecological compensation with employment and poverty reduction,and promoting the transformation of ecological value.
[1]刘培林，钱滔，黄先海，等.共同富裕的内涵、实现路径与测度方法[J].管理世界，2021，37(8)：117-129.
[2]张晖，吴霜，张燕媛，等.流域生态补偿政策对受偿地区经济增长的影响研究：以安徽省黄山市为例[J].长江流域资源与环境，2019，28(12)：2848-2856.
[3]刘聪，张宁.新安江流域横向生态补偿的经济效应[J].中国环境科学，2021，41(4)：1940-1948.
[4]王慧杰，毕粉粉，董战峰.基于AHP-模糊综合评价法的新安江流域生态补偿政策绩效评估[J].生态学报，2020，40(20)：7493-7506.
[5]彭玉婷.新安江流域水源地生态补偿的综合效益评价[J].江淮论坛，2020(5)：75-82.
[6]娜仁，陈艺，万伦来，等.中国典型流域生态补偿财政支出的减贫效应研究：来自2010—2017年安徽新安江流域的经验数据[J].财政研究，2020(5)：51-62.
[7]李坦，徐帆，祁云云.从“共饮一江水”到“共护一江水”：新安江生态补偿下农户就业与收入的变化[J].管理世界，2022，38(11)：102-124.
[8]卢文秀，吴方卫.生态补偿横向转移支付能缩小城乡收入差距吗?：基于2000—2019年中国典型流域生态补偿的经验证据[J].财政研究，2022(7)：35-51.
[9]马军旗，乐章.黄河流域生态补偿的水环境治理效应：基于双重差分方法的检验[J].资源科学，2021，43(11)：2277-2288.
[10]吴凤平，邵志颖，季英雯.新安江流域横向生态补偿政策的减排和绿色发展效应研究[J].软科学，2022，36(9)：65-71.
[11]张晖，顾典，吴霜，等.流域生态补偿政策下受偿地区碳减排效应：以新安江流域为例[J].资源科学，2022，44(4)：768-779.
[12]QUAN T S,ZHANG H,LI J,et al.Horizontal ecological compensation mechanism and green low-carbon development in river basins:Evidence from Xin’an river basin[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2023,30(38):88463-88480.
[13]马庆华，杜鹏飞.新安江流域生态补偿政策效果评价研究[J].中国环境管理，2015，7(3)：63-70.
[14]ENGEL S,PAGIOLA S,WUNDER S.Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice:An overview of the issues[J].Ecological Economics,2008,65(4):664-674.
[15]MU?OZ-PI?A C,GUEVARA A,TORRES J M,et al.Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico’s forests:Analysis,negotiations and results[J].Ecological Economics,2008,65(4):725-736.
[16]CORBERA E,SOBERANIS C G,BROWN K.Institutional dimensions of payments for ecosystem services:An analysis of Mexico’s carbon forestry programme[J].Ecological Economics,2009,68(3):743-761.
[17]崔惠玉.共同富裕视阈下生态补偿财政政策研究[J].甘肃社会科学，2022(4)：174-183.
[18]HEATH J,BINSWANGER H.Natural resource degradation effects of poverty and population growth are largely policy-induced:The case of Colombia[J].Environment and Development Economics,1996,1(1):65-84.
[19]GASTINEAU P,TAUGOURDEAU E.Compensating for environmental damages[J].Ecological Economics,2014,97:150-161.
[20]PAGIOLA S,ARCENAS A,PLATAIS G.Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty?An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America[J].World Development,2005,33(2):237-253.
[21]ZHANG W,PAGIOLA S.Assessing the potential for synergies in the implementation of payments for environmental services programmes:An empirical analysis of Costa Rica[J].Environmental Conservation,2011,38(4):406-416.
[22]TACCONI L.Redefining payments for environmental services[J].Ecological Economics,2012,73:29-36.
[23]KWAYU E J,PAAVOLA J,SALLU S M.The livelihood impacts of the equitable payments for watershed services (EPWS) program in Morogoro,Tanzania[J].Environment and Development Economics,2017,22(3):328-349.
[24]钟茂初，李梦洁，杜威剑.环境规制能否倒逼产业结构调整：基于中国省际面板数据的实证检验[J].中国人口·资源与环境，2015，25(8)：107-115.
[25]郑石明，邹克，李红霞.绿色发展促进共同富裕：理论阐释与实证研究[J].政治学研究，2022(2)：52-65.
[26]江艇.因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J].中国工业经济，2022(5)：100-120.
[27]李实.共同富裕的目标和实现路径选择[J].经济研究，2021，56(11)：4-13.
[28]沈满洪.生态文明视角下的共同富裕观[J].治理研究，2021，37(5)：5-13.
[29]徐敏，姜勇.中国产业结构升级能缩小城乡消费差距吗?[J].数量经济技术经济研究，2015，32(3)：3-21.
[30]余泳泽，曹瑞.数字经济与共同富裕：基于中国城乡收入差距的视角分析[J].兰州财经大学学报，2023，39(1)：1-15.
[31]黄茂兴，李军军.技术选择、产业结构升级与经济增长[J].经济研究，2009，44(7)：143-151.
[32]骆永民，骆熙，汪卢俊.农村基础设施、工农业劳动生产率差距与非农就业[J].管理世界，2020，36(12)：91-121.
基本信息:
中图分类号:X321;F126
引用信息:
[1]张晖,陆滨强,权天舒.从生态补偿到共同富裕：路径机制与实证检验[J].生态经济,2025,41(07):204-210+229.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金项目“长江流域生态保护绿色利益分享机制研究”(21BGL167)
2025-07-07
2025-07-07